↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of two Pantoea strains isolated from extra-virgin olive oil

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of two Pantoea strains isolated from extra-virgin olive oil
Published in
AMB Express, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13568-018-0642-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graziano Pizzolante, Miriana Durante, Daniela Rizzo, Marco Di Salvo, Salvatore Maurizio Tredici, Maria Tufariello, Angelo De Paolis, Adelfia Talà, Giovanni Mita, Pietro Alifano, Giuseppe Egidio De Benedetto

Abstract

The olive oil is an unfavorable substrate for microbial survival and growth. Only few microorganisms use olive oil fatty acids as carbon and energy sources, and survive in the presence of olive oil anti-microbial components. In this study, we have evaluated the occurrence of microorganisms in 1-year-stored extra-virgin olive oil samples. We detected the presence of bacterial and yeast species with a recurrence of the bacterium Stenotrophomonas rhizophila and yeast Sporobolomyces roseus. We then assayed the ability of all isolates to grow in a mineral medium supplemented with a commercial extra-virgin olive oil as a sole carbon and energy source, and analyzed the utilization of olive oil fatty acids during their growth. We finally focused on two bacterial isolates belonging to the species Pantoea septica. Both these isolates produce carotenoids, and one of them synthesizes bioemulsifiers enabling the bacteria to better survive/growth in this unfavorable substrate. Analyses point to a mixture of glycolipids with glucose, galactose and xylose as carbohydrate moieties whereas the lipid domain was constituted by C6-C10 β-hydroxy carboxylic acids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#808
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,920
of 326,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.