↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1013013322947
Authors

Claire Robb, Hongbin Chen, William E. Haley

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 48%
Social Sciences 14 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,912,289
of 13,536,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Geropsychology
#2
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,596
of 238,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Geropsychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them