↓ Skip to main content

Transposable elements as activators of cryptic genes in E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in Genetica, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Transposable elements as activators of cryptic genes in E. coli
Published in
Genetica, December 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1003936706129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry G. Hall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Belgium 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genetica
#475
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,218
of 107,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetica
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.