↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity, conservation and inventory: why insects matter

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, June 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity, conservation and inventory: why insects matter
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, June 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00056668
Authors

Ke Chung Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Mexico 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 196 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 39 18%
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Professor 14 6%
Other 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 65%
Environmental Science 39 18%
Unspecified 15 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Other 9 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,716,079
of 12,340,632 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#927
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,824
of 245,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.