↓ Skip to main content

Normal patterns of 18F-FDG appendiceal uptake in children

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Normal patterns of 18F-FDG appendiceal uptake in children
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00247-013-2835-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamilton E. Reavey, Adina L. Alazraki, Stephen F. Simoneaux

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Psychology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Energy 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,270,251
of 13,194,193 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#740
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,225
of 267,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#33
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,194,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.