↓ Skip to main content

Shifting vulnerabilities: gender and reproductive care on the migrant trail to Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Comparative Migration Studies, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 295)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Shifting vulnerabilities: gender and reproductive care on the migrant trail to Europe
Published in
Comparative Migration Studies, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40878-018-0089-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Grotti, Cynthia Malakasis, Chiara Quagliariello, Nina Sahraoui

Abstract

The reproductive care of pregnant migrants entering the European Union via its Mediterranean borders represents an under-examined topic, despite a growing scholarly emphasis on female migrants and the gendered aspects of migration in the past three decades. This article uses ethnographic data gathered in Greece, Italy, and Spain to examine pregnant migrants' experiences of crossing, first reception, and reproductive care. We discuss our findings through the conceptual lens of vulnerability, which we understand as a shifting and relational condition attributed to, or dynamically endorsed by, migrant patients within given social contexts and encounters. We focus on two principal aspects of migrant women's experiences. First, we shed light on their profiles, their journeys to Europe via the three main Mediterranean routes, and the conditions of first reception. Through ethnographic vignettes we examine the diverse ways in which pregnant migrants become vulnerable within these contexts. Second, we turn to the reproductive healthcare they receive in EU borderlands. We explore how declinations of ideas of vulnerability shape the medical encounter between healthcare professionals and migrant women and how vulnerability is dynamically used or contested by migrant patients to engage in meaningful social relations in unpredictable and unstable borderlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Unspecified 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 41 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,103,217
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Migration Studies
#24
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,561
of 341,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Migration Studies
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them