↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 141)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Published in
African Archaeological Review, January 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1021612012892
Authors

Felix A. Chami

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 37%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 13 43%
Social Sciences 7 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,547,461
of 12,342,655 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#30
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,077
of 245,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them