↓ Skip to main content

CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids for high-performance anode of lithium-ion batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids for high-performance anode of lithium-ion batteries
Published in
Discover Nano, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-8-499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenhai Wen, Suqin Ci, Shun Mao, Shumao Cui, Zhen He, Junhong Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 26%
Engineering 5 19%
Materials Science 5 19%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#227
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,296
of 315,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.