| Title |
Meat alternatives: life cycle assessment of most known meat substitutes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-015-0931-6 |
| Authors |
Sergiy Smetana, Alexander Mathys, Achim Knoch, Volker Heinz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 204 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 191 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 11% |
| Researcher | 112 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 101 | 9% |
| Unknown | 376 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 199 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 129 | 11% |
| Engineering | 74 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 34 | 3% |
| Other | 203 | 18% |
| Unknown | 450 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#98,618
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#2
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#934
of 278,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.