@northwoods1980 i got you fam (https://t.co/H5L5AOO6LF). Also, refer to Terrett "Vertberobasilar Stroke Following Manipulation (1996)."
@millalilly @McEllenJ https://t.co/hAYslloOFe As far as strokes that risk is about the same as going to any doctor.
@samjcohn The most well regarded biomechanical engineer and epidemiologists in the world have studied this and found NO evidence that VAD is caused by chiropractic manipulation. What is your evidence? https://t.co/JyIviI5bqb https://t.co/MmbWxlPI2G http
@snj_1970 Yeah this opinion isn't supported by the evidence https://t.co/gRRNvPXZRC https://t.co/gEIZv7NUqN
@MikeAlphaOne @QuackDetector This is a good one too https://t.co/rQpU6FcKis
@drsebheaven @NaanDerthaal @FastestSurgeon @GiblyMd I think you need to read the Cassidy paper so we can be on the same page It was on people going to see a PCP or a DC for neck pain/headaches and then going on to have a stroke. It’s a retrospective, case-
@davidfralinger @NaanDerthaal Yes, there has always been one. But as you know, correlation does not equal causation. This study found a greater (but not significant) association between going to a physician and having a stroke than going to a chiropractor.
@dpnnn @hu5tl_e @privatebankass This has been debunked long ago https://t.co/xusBnlqB1u
@CyruxiME When you compare with GP visits, the effect is the same. It probably just means that people are already experiencing head or neck pain and seeking help for that. https://t.co/tmntdgqrKY
@TheEric_Dallman @acweyand @cgarrettwilson Some reading on the association, risk, occurrence and plausibility https://t.co/yOTc4SkDXx https://t.co/Nc7wKwySyr https://t.co/9Ax0SB4iGl
@Mxhrad @responsibleMDs Not a chiropractor. Willing to be convinced with an evidence-based argument. Here’s some sources. https://t.co/orNEVrTFnu https://t.co/h8f8dxkBVV
@Cath77777 https://t.co/tmntdgI39y Onderzoek wijst uit dat het minimale risico op zo’n specifieke vorm van een beroerte, zowel een link heeft met naar de chiro gaan als naar de huisarts gaan. Geeft vooral aan dat mensen vlak vooraf al met nek-of hoofdpijn
@laurentmarc45 @SonjonYvan @baillyflo @mireisdorf Problématique existante avec ou sans manipulation/mobilisation https://t.co/4OIAyWttv8
@joslerdrstriker カイロプラクティックに関してはあまり詳しくないので、調べてみたのですが、これくらいしか出てこないので、関連ありの報告があれば是非教えて欲しいです。 https://t.co/KimueMhzVU
@TomScibelli That influencer HAD a stroke in progress (neck injury caused her to go to the chiro) and the chiro didn’t catch it. He did not cause it. As such, that’s what the research shows. https://t.co/Y44PP7MPo2
@ChristianAssad I think you should check these studies out before assuming the dissections you saw were from a cervical manipulation: https://t.co/XFiCoRoNO5 https://t.co/Q1NfVM6XGD https://t.co/tiyiDbp7uS
@islaYEG @DrGolfShirt https://t.co/1fr8lnrbLz And a couple of slide from the CEU course I went to. I HIGHLY recommend going to these courses to understand what we do as physios and evidence based chiros to help you know who to refer your patients to. http
.@dblep7 You need to read this https://t.co/le9lZEnbbH #SinghBCA
@jonah_hoff @KATMIRIAMXO Not true at all, the stroke everyone likes to refer to is called a Vertebrobasilar artery stroke and it is no more common than in Chiropractic than it is in Medical doctors/PCP offices. https://t.co/JKZeFLJES7
@LiliHuettlinger @CiarraCherry @MrTweetBullshit Here is a peer reviewed article about VBAI & Chiropractic care. Research about the topic of chiropractic has been going on for years & they will continue to dive into this growing field of medicine!
@LiliHuettlinger More likely these patients were already having a stroke when they went to the chiropractor. Studies show no causative relationship between arterial dissection and cervical manipulation. https://t.co/N2dSbHLhBc https://t.co/LqzBQoUk7J
@LiliHuettlinger This is not true. This has already been studied. https://t.co/eXh5rpiQek
@LiliHuettlinger @Bcsiernik @TRamsdaleDC2B Well there’s the obvious one, https://t.co/U0OIoieFfL
@MichaelBuratovi @compandalt https://t.co/lVAQsTgI34 Cassidy study has explained that better than me. Any treatment done on the wrong patient at the wrong time is dangerous. Not the manip, it’s the failure to notice an early presentation of CAD. Which may
@Pain_NeuRa @Sarah_Mojarad But to the first point in your response, I would be curious to hear your thoughts regarding this paper --- https://t.co/CNzqveicUG
@gniwing A ma connaissance voici la seule étude ayant utilisée la codification des DAV dans un système de santé. https://t.co/MTq9A8NAZd
@Daneshmend @EdzardErnst Good work. Although thanks to more recent, much larger case-control studies, we know there is more to this than was first suspected: https://t.co/4TbmQiL3f3
@michelseydur Lisez l'étude. Données recueillies sur l'Ass Maladie Ontario où les actes chiro étaient côtés et remboursés. donc on sait exactement si le patient a été manipulé, ou si il a juste passé la porte de cabinet chiro et été référé aux urgences. h
Une petite étude IRL sur une population de 100 millions de personnes démontre que les accidents vertebro-basilaires sont extrèmement rares et surviennent autant après une visite de généraliste qu'une visite chez le chiro. https://t.co/T2DufFQa3C https://t
This is a study of 100 million person years, that proves your are full of it. There is no science that supports any of your hate filled claims @TheSciBabe, let me know if you need help with the big words. https://t.co/qv6iiHHf9x
@CombatSportPhys @NewGrad_Physio @RogerKerry1 That's a different question, my question was focused more on the usage of it as a high risk treatment. And would those who develop stroke have developed that anyhow? https://t.co/C2vopnDm3o
@DMcInHiding [1/4] https://t.co/bDpqzqf8rt Vertebral artery dissections are very uncommon(see article), however they do happen in rare circumstances.
@RaquelLaneri as far as stroke is concerned, read the Cassidy study. Research goes both ways. No causation. https://t.co/j2ZxSl4JO3
In the wake of the tragic death of Katie May, I wanted to share some research on the subject. When a patient... https://t.co/BBQKb33leM
@drtaranarula check out this study. I believe it comes from a creditable source https://t.co/ShS2HJMBim
@SueIeraci Full text http://t.co/nTy4EpqV7y More http://t.co/t5Tt0uCPsz cc @resonable_hank
Straight from PubMed - Spine Journal "We found no evidence of excess risk of VBA stroke associated chiropractic care" http://t.co/MocbhjsK1f
@alexyourhealth sorry, wrong Cassidy et al, it’s this one http://t.co/gFDA8zBMjM i think you were talking about.
@alexyourhealth sorry, wrong Cassidy et al, it’s this one http://t.co/gFDA8zBMjM i think you were talking about.
@seattlechiro1 Very safe... this PubMed study (and common sense) proves it. http://t.co/BpSO7oL8eA
@BangZoomMMA and here is where scientists actually read http://t.co/2a528RJ82F
@Demaerschalk @Forbes is a "scientific statement" really scientific when it is made in the face of empirical data? http://t.co/Ha3k7FxGnW
There is no scientiffic evidence that chiropractic cause stroke. http://t.co/PUJQREh70X … … … #chiropractic
There is no scientiffic evidence that chiropractic cause stroke. http://t.co/PUJQREh70X … … (and the spelling is wrong too!)#chiropratic
There is no scientiffic evidence that chiropractic cause stroke. http://t.co/PUJQREh70X #kiropraktik
There is no scientiffic evidence that chiropractic cause stroke.http://t.co/iWEz2WVt7c
@zak_acupuncture @dailykos There is no scientiffic evidence that chiropractic cause stroke. https://t.co/BXnoiUOLDm http://t.co/PUJQREh70X
Full text of Cassidy et al's dubious 'Risk of Vertebrobasilar Stroke and Chiropractic Care' paper http://t.co/9ntzIs39 #SinghBCA
RT @Catherine___H: @Blue_Wode @EdzardErnst http://t.co/vkTTvtCz Association does not define Cause and effect @bcapresident
@Blue_Wode @EdzardErnst http://t.co/vkTTvtCz Association does not define Cause and effect @bcapresident