↓ Skip to main content

Boron nitride nanotubes: synthesis and applications

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Convergence, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 129)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Boron nitride nanotubes: synthesis and applications
Published in
Nano Convergence, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40580-018-0149-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Hee Kim, Thang Viet Pham, Jae Hun Hwang, Cheol Sang Kim, Myung Jong Kim

Abstract

Boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) has similar tubular nanostructure as carbon nanotube (CNT) in which boron and nitrogen atoms arranged in a hexagonal network. Owing to the unique atomic structure, BNNT has numerous excellent intrinsic properties such as superior mechanical strength , high thermal conductivity, electrically insulating behavior, piezoelectric property, neutron shielding capability, and oxidation resistance. Since BNNT was first synthesized in 1995, developing efficient BNNT production route has been a significant issue due to low yield and poor quality in comparison with CNT, thus limiting its practical uses. However, many great successes in BNNT synthesis have been achieved in recent years, enabling access to this material and paving the way for the development of promising applications. In this article, we discussed current progress in the production of boron nitride nanotube, focusing on the most common and effective methods that have been well established so far. In addition, we presented various applications of BNNT including polymer composite reinforcement, thermal management packages, piezo actuators, and neutron shielding nanomaterial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 304 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 19%
Student > Master 38 13%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 107 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 47 15%
Engineering 39 13%
Chemistry 37 12%
Chemical Engineering 17 6%
Physics and Astronomy 14 5%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 122 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,634,138
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Nano Convergence
#21
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,465
of 336,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Convergence
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them