↓ Skip to main content

Statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones and resveratrol as adjunctive therapies in sepsis: could mitochondria be a common target?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones and resveratrol as adjunctive therapies in sepsis: could mitochondria be a common target?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-2-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerome Morel, Mervyn Singer

Abstract

Through their pleiotropic actions, statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones and resveratrol can target multiple mechanisms involved in sepsis. Their actions on mitochondrial function are of interest in a pathological state where bioenergetic failure may play a key role in the development of organ dysfunction. We review these four drug groups as potential adjunctive therapies in sepsis with a particular focus upon mitochondria. Systematic review of clinical and experimental trials was done with a literature search using the PubMed database. Search terms included statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones, resveratrol, mitochondria, sepsis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, inflammation, oxidative stress and organ dysfunction. With the exception of statins, most of the compelling evidence for the use of these agents in sepsis comes from the experimental literature. The agents all exert anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, plus protective effects against mitochondrial dysfunction and stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Improved outcomes (organ dysfunction, survival) have been reported in a variety of sepsis models. Notably, positive outcome effects were more commonly seen when the agents were given as pre- rather than post-treatment of sepsis. Statins, fibrates, thiazolidinediones and resveratrol prevent sepsis-induced injury to organs and organelles with outcome improvements. Their effects on mitochondrial function may be integral in offering this protection. Definitive clinical trials are needed to evaluate their utility in septic patients or those at high risk of developing sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,288,585
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#364
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,643
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.