↓ Skip to main content

Group actions on treelike compact spaces

Overview of attention for article published in SCIENCE CHINA Mathematics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Group actions on treelike compact spaces
Published in
SCIENCE CHINA Mathematics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11425-018-9488-9
Authors

Eli Glasner, Michael Megrelishvili

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,958,119
of 13,458,103 outputs
Outputs from SCIENCE CHINA Mathematics
#100,854
of 524,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,223
of 268,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SCIENCE CHINA Mathematics
#6,620
of 27,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,458,103 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.