↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation?
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0053-6
Authors

Yousuke Sato, Seiya Nishizawa, Hisashi Yashiro, Yoshiaki Miyamoto, Yoshiyuki Kajikawa, Hirofumi Tomita

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 44%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,953,851
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#248
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,772
of 266,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.