↓ Skip to main content

The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures
Published in
Public Choice, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11127-008-9336-4
Authors

Yogesh Uppal

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 45%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Unspecified 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 43%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 31%
Unspecified 7 14%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,434,232
of 12,337,097 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#116
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,976
of 241,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,337,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.