↓ Skip to main content

Intersection homology of toric varieties and a conjecture of Kalai

Overview of attention for article published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Intersection homology of toric varieties and a conjecture of Kalai
Published in
Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/s000140050098
Authors

T. Braden, R. MacPherson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,607,784
of 13,110,606 outputs
Outputs from Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici
#1
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,344
of 268,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,110,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them