↓ Skip to main content

Explaining farmers’ reluctance to adopt recommendations for sustainable ecosystem management

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Explaining farmers’ reluctance to adopt recommendations for sustainable ecosystem management
Published in
Ecological Processes, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13717-018-0133-9
Authors

Bezaiet Dessalegn, Ludmilla Kiktenko, Balzhan Zhumagazina, Saltanat Zhakenova, Vinay Nangia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Lecturer 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 25 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Engineering 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 30 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,212,273
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#86
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,556
of 332,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.