↓ Skip to main content

The effects of food stamp receipt on weight gained by expectant mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Population Economics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
The effects of food stamp receipt on weight gained by expectant mothers
Published in
Journal of Population Economics, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00148-011-0391-7
Authors

Charles L. Baum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,410,276
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#383
of 684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,877
of 140,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.