Title |
Remarkable Phenytoin Sensitivity in 4 Children with SCN8A-related Epilepsy: A Molecular Neuropharmacological Approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurotherapeutics, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13311-015-0372-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ragna S. Boerma, Kees P. Braun, Maarten P. H. van de Broek, Frederique M. C. van Berkestijn, Marielle E. Swinkels, Eveline O. Hagebeuk, Dick Lindhout, Marjan van Kempen, Maartje Boon, Joost Nicolai, Carolien G. de Kovel, Eva H. Brilstra, Bobby P. C. Koeleman |
Abstract |
Mutations in SCN8A are associated with epilepsy and intellectual disability. SCN8A encodes for sodium channel Nav1.6, which is located in the brain. Gain-of-function missense mutations in SCN8A are thought to lead to increased firing of excitatory neurons containing Nav1.6, and therefore to lead to increased seizure susceptibility. We hypothesized that sodium channel blockers could have a beneficial effect in patients with SCN8A-related epilepsy by blocking the overactive Nav1.6 and thereby counteracting the effect of the mutation. Herein, we describe 4 patients with a missense SCN8A mutation and epilepsy who all show a remarkably good response on high doses of phenytoin and loss of seizure control when phenytoin medication was reduced, while side effects were relatively mild. In 2 patients, repeated withdrawal of phenytoin led to the reoccurrence of seizures. Based on the findings in these patients and the underlying molecular mechanism we consider treatment with (high-dose) phenytoin as a possible treatment option in patients with difficult-to-control seizures due to an SCN8A mutation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 88% |
Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 21 | 27% |