@anibalmastobiza No lo parece https://t.co/tvjEnqQjVx
@alex_pollien @lfaliaj @MorletRivelliM D'ailleurs, mon domaine qui utilise les mêmes méthodes stats que la psycho sociale réplique très bien : https://t.co/cQVhG6bQNE
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy - Review of Philosophy and Psychology https://t.co/CXWLXvUnmD
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy - Review of Philosophy and Psychology https://t.co/CXWLXvUnmD
RT @xphilosopher: People are completely right! A large-scale replication project by @CovaFlorian et al. found that the actor/observer diff…
People are completely right! A large-scale replication project by @CovaFlorian et al. found that the actor/observer difference for trolley intuitions failed to replicate https://t.co/JExMQxfbYA
RT @xphilosopher: @R_P_Doran Great question! Here are some thoughts about the answer:
@R_P_Doran Great question! Here are some thoughts about the answer:
@R_P_Doran To begin with: There is obviously a difference. The majority of experimental philosophy studies replicate successfully, whereas the majority of social psychology studies fail to replicate https://t.co/JExMQxfbYA
@PatrickDucray Pour le coup, c'est des psychologues qui sont en faute. Pour le reste, je ne connais pas d'évaluation générale du domaine. On avait fait quelques analyses sur un échantillon représentatif dans ce papier : https://t.co/cQVhG6biY6
@NorthS2021 @Rortian @alexbryant_ But it’s not true that there is a replication problem for experimental philosophy generally Most experimental philosophy studies are not about that specific thing, and most of them replicate beautifully https://t.co/JExM
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy - Review of Philosophy and Psychology https://t.co/LjWVAtmPB9
@olivertraldi @dbaten3 Exactly! The difference is actually very large. Experimental and philosophy studies successfully replicate MUCH more often than psychology studies do https://t.co/JExMQxfbYA
Lasst uns noch ein bisschen darüber reden, warum an vielen Stellen Studien publiziert werden, die sich am Ende doch nicht replizieren lassen. Denn eigentlich ist Wissenschaft ja daran interessiert, tatsächliche Erkenntnisse über die Welt zu generieren.
RT @realsci_DE: Heißt das, dass man wissenschaftlichen Studien nicht glauben sollte? Nein, das heißt es nicht. Wenn Studien entsprechend…
RT @realsci_DE: Heißt das, dass man wissenschaftlichen Studien nicht glauben sollte? Nein, das heißt es nicht. Wenn Studien entsprechend…
Heißt das, dass man wissenschaftlichen Studien nicht glauben sollte? Nein, das heißt es nicht. Wenn Studien entsprechend der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis gemacht sind, kann man den Ergebnissen vertrauen.
Überraschend viele Ergebnisse lassen sich nicht replizieren (https://t.co/5qTsHQTBdi, https://t.co/QtMe9kITUY, https://t.co/3wUtyeSGLi). In manchen Forschungsfeldern ist die Realisierbarkeit zwar höher als in anderen, aber insgesamt schaut es trotzdem nich
@ewinsberg @NeuroYogacara @QuillRKukla @anotherpanacea @nescio13 @lastpositivist @DailyNousEditor My bet would be this paper. Even with overlap, that would amount to a massive number of co-authors https://t.co/wg2lJepJ1J
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
@Nicole_C_Nelson
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
RT @briandavidearp: Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/no…
Finally published! :) Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/nooxZj9ovc
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @RubinPsyc: Replication crisis in experimental philosophy? Replication attempts by 20 teams of a representative sample of 40 experimen…
RT @RubinPsyc: Replication crisis in experimental philosophy? Replication attempts by 20 teams of a representative sample of 40 experimen…
RT @RubinPsyc: Replication crisis in experimental philosophy? Replication attempts by 20 teams of a representative sample of 40 experimen…
RT @RubinPsyc: Replication crisis in experimental philosophy? Replication attempts by 20 teams of a representative sample of 40 experimen…
Replication crisis in experimental philosophy? Replication attempts by 20 teams of a representative sample of 40 experimental philosophy studies published during 2003-2015 yield 70% successful replications. https://t.co/I9kT6cX8sJ
The kind of research GPP researchers do is highly reliable, as shown by this just published paper. (One of the authors is a GPP PI). https://t.co/oaBF2Qfzzs
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @ViliusDranseika: Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
Out on paper https://t.co/cKbe8ODsAt
RT @giladfeldman: Ah, yeah, and this ultra impressive mass replication project in Experimental Philosophy by @CovaFlorian and many wonderfu…
Ah, yeah, and this ultra impressive mass replication project in Experimental Philosophy by @CovaFlorian and many wonderful other X-Philes, e.g. @fierycushman @briandavidearp @phillipsjs @AllardThuriot (of the ones I could find on Twitter) https://t.co/TRC
RT @beyzatepe: Experimental Philosophy studies successfully replicated about 70% of the time => why do they have a high replication rate?…
Experimental Philosophy studies successfully replicated about 70% of the time => why do they have a high replication rate? https://t.co/YeS2G5ASFV
@talyarkoni Our research also replicates at reasonably high rates for a social science at about 70%: https://t.co/kvA9bYFyvh Further, maybe interesting a p-curve analysis of the x-phi corpus: https://t.co/tneme1YYfO https://t.co/Ib6zGBjN5T
@NicolasVdrines1 @3r_n3s @idg_pharma @joex92_ @lebon80 @JFuhrerSensei @raoult_didier @YanisJGR Vous inquiétez pas pour moi, on a fait exactement le même genre d'étude dans mon champ de recherche et on a trouvé que 80% environ des études donnaient des résul
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/K1YjHGfBju
@wesbuc @byrd_nick @CovaFlorian @kneer And the @CovaFlorian replication project finds no effect of taking the CRT on subsequent philosophical intuitions https://t.co/JExMQxfbYA
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/p9Avx8XEt8
RT briandavidearp: RT ax_phi: jonlewis84 xphilosopher bioxphi paul_henne nsfaber briandavidearp Under the latter characterization, I think probably only the "amateur-psychology" objection clearly covers it? See the conclusion of Cova et al. (2018) for a …
RT @ax_phi: @jonlewis84 @xphilosopher @bioxphi @paul_henne @nsfaber @briandavidearp Under the latter characterization, I think probably onl…
@jonlewis84 @xphilosopher @bioxphi @paul_henne @nsfaber @briandavidearp Under the latter characterization, I think probably only the "amateur-psychology" objection clearly covers it? See the conclusion of Cova et al. (2018) for a discussion of this with a
RT @ax_phi: @JustinCaouette Between https://t.co/wg2lJepJ1J, https://t.co/DGLIjXNheS, and https://t.co/f5jnTRF3CB, the "amateur psychology"…
@JustinCaouette Between https://t.co/wg2lJepJ1J, https://t.co/DGLIjXNheS, and https://t.co/f5jnTRF3CB, the "amateur psychology" objection to x-phi is looking pretty bad. Don't see this general objection in print much, but anecdotally I suspect this view is
RT @xphilosopher: @StefanFSchubert Great idea! Replication paper showing that experimental philosophy studies overwhelmingly replicate su…
@StefanFSchubert Great idea! Replication paper showing that experimental philosophy studies overwhelmingly replicate successfully: https://t.co/JExMQxwMQ8 Paper showing that experimental philosophers make fewer statistical errors: https://t.co/IDFgP8l
RT @JustinCaouette: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/T4Rq9Zkcke
RT @JustinCaouette: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/T4Rq9Zkcke
RT @JustinCaouette: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/T4Rq9Zkcke
RT @JustinCaouette: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/T4Rq9Zkcke
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/T4Rq9Zkcke
RT @SpringerEthics: Review of Philosophy and Psychology Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/AedE1DAD3x
RT @SpringerEthics: Review of Philosophy and Psychology Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/AedE1DAD3x
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/AedE1DAD3x
@danengber And here is one that didn't: https://t.co/JExMQxfbYA
RT briandavidearp: RT briandavidearp: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/UJm8jTKjTS https://t.co/3nuTS56roK
RT @briandavidearp: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/IVxzDi5Jcj
RT briandavidearp: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/UJm8jTKjTS https://t.co/3nuTS56roK
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/IVxzDi5Jcj
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa
RT @briandavidearp: @BrianNosek @EvoMellor Other disciplines section missing this https://t.co/zngoGGe1uC
@BrianNosek @EvoMellor Other disciplines section missing this https://t.co/zngoGGe1uC
UEA Philosophy lecturer @andowjames was part of this big project to assess the reproducibility of research in Experimental Philosophy, read the article here: https://t.co/7neBnZE0Sg https://t.co/MimeD49QpT
A nice effort to test the reproducibility of X-phi studies, this kind of large scale collaboration warms my (otherwise ice cold) heart https://t.co/vntUq5dSVW
PhD student Tania Moerenhout was part of a research project on the reproducibility of experimental #philosophy. You can find the results of this project in the following publication: https://t.co/Vm62Jflxvl
RT @clayroutledge: "Based on three different classification systems, we converged on an estimated replication rate situated between 70 and…
RT @clayroutledge: "Based on three different classification systems, we converged on an estimated replication rate situated between 70 and…
"Based on three different classification systems, we converged on an estimated replication rate situated between 70 and 78%. This means that, roughly, the replication rate for experimental philosophy would be 3 out 4. This appears to be good news for exper
RT @briandavidearp: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/LZJTms6dbf
RT @briandavidearp: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/LZJTms6dbf
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy https://t.co/L7wqp94Eaa https://t.co/LZJTms6dbf