↓ Skip to main content

Detecting Autism Spectrum Disorders in the General Practitioner’S Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Detecting Autism Spectrum Disorders in the General Practitioner’S Practice
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1384-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle A. M. M. van Tongerloo, Hans H. J. Bor, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

It takes considerable time before Autism Spectrum Disorders are diagnosed. Validated diagnostic instruments are available, but not applicable to primary healthcare. By means of a case-control study we investigated whether there were differences in presented complaints and referral patterns between children with ASD (n = 49) and a control group of children without ASD (n = 81). Children with ASD were often presented as crybabies and often showed feeding problems. They visited the GP's surgery more often with anxiety disorders, enuresis, and sleeping disorders. They were referred more often to physiotherapists and speech-therapists and had tympanostomy tubes and tonsillectomies more often. Depression in the parents of children with ASD was remarkably prevalent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,373,934
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,318
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,168
of 143,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#27
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.