309 followers
RT @iainh_z: Study of 58 papers found peer reviewers known personally to journal Editor more likely to complete their reviews https://t.co/…
1,823 followers
Study of 58 papers found peer reviewers known personally to journal Editor more likely to complete their reviews https://t.co/JjukGYhBIf
1,001 followers
This is why I buy people beer at conferences: https://t.co/3v5WlKSdJK #springerlink
588 followers
RT @Science_Open: Interesting new study on time taking during peer review and editorial workflows https://t.co/f7nHXoBl16 OA @DoctorZen
18,076 followers
Interesting new study on time taking during peer review and editorial workflows https://t.co/f7nHXoBl16 OA @DoctorZen
6,140 followers
#Review time in #peerreview: quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows https://t.co/iww8rUkh7h
31,557 followers
Review time in peer review: quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows https://t.co/6bLDxzVl4p
380 followers
Study indicates efficiency of peer review dependent on "complex network of mutual connections" and Eds. role is key. https://t.co/RTePisidgW
3,633 followers
RT @Research_Voice: Review times in #peerreview: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows http://t.co/5URhDGdWUD #science #publishing #…
22,865 followers
Review times in #peerreview: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows http://t.co/5URhDGdWUD #science #publishing #editors
353 followers
Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows http://t.co/5MKvgeVafz
8,926 followers
"Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows" See http://t.co/tOEezZJZVj
797 followers
Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows. (arXiv:1508.01134v1 [physics.soc-ph]) http://t.co/wkTVYp0fzz
1,908 followers
Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows. http://t.co/XWvQp6cLCm