↓ Skip to main content

Cycles in oceanic teleconnections and global temperature change

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical & Applied Climatology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Cycles in oceanic teleconnections and global temperature change
Published in
Theoretical & Applied Climatology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2533-2
Authors

Knut L. Seip, Øyvind Grøn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,265,969
of 13,118,813 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#137
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,742
of 269,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,118,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.