↓ Skip to main content

Developing key performance indicators to measure the progress of regional regulatory convergence and cooperation in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Developing key performance indicators to measure the progress of regional regulatory convergence and cooperation in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
Published in
AAPS Open, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41120-018-0024-2
Authors

Sannie Siaw Foong Chong, John C. W. Lim, Toshiyoshi Tominaga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,637,483
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#29
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,920
of 331,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them