↓ Skip to main content

Smoldering Combustion and Ground Fires: Ecological Effects and Multi-Scale Significance

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Smoldering Combustion and Ground Fires: Ecological Effects and Multi-Scale Significance
Published in
Fire Ecology, April 2013
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0901124
Authors

Adam C. Watts, Leda N. Kobziar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Other 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 25%
Engineering 6 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Energy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#11,441,451
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#106
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,883
of 287,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them