↓ Skip to main content

Structured P2P technologies for distributed command and control

Overview of attention for article published in Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structured P2P technologies for distributed command and control
Published in
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12083-009-0033-y
Authors

Daniel R. Karrels, Gilbert L. Peterson, Barry E. Mullins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Netherlands 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,340,815
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#39
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,889
of 93,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.