↓ Skip to main content

Structured P2P technologies for distributed command and control

Overview of attention for article published in Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structured P2P technologies for distributed command and control
Published in
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12083-009-0033-y
Authors

Daniel R. Karrels, Gilbert L. Peterson, Barry E. Mullins

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 10%
United Kingdom 1 10%
Netherlands 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 50%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 70%
Psychology 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,818,094
of 5,307,751 outputs
Outputs from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#6
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,476
of 187,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,307,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.