↓ Skip to main content

From underlying chemistry to therapeutic potential: open questions in the new field of lysine polyphosphorylation

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
From underlying chemistry to therapeutic potential: open questions in the new field of lysine polyphosphorylation
Published in
Current Genetics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00294-018-0854-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Bentley-DeSousa, Michael Downey

Abstract

Polyphosphorylation is a newly described non-enzymatic post-translational modification wherein long chains of inorganic phosphates are attached to lysine residues. The first targets of polyphosphorylation identified were S. cerevisiae proteins Nsr1 and Top1. Building on this theme, we recently exploited functional genomics tools in yeast to identify 15 new targets, including a conserved network of nucleolar proteins implicated in ribosome biogenesis. We also described the polyphosphorylation of six human proteins, suggesting that this unique post-translational modification could be conserved throughout eukaryotes. The study of polyphosphorylation seems poised to uncover novel modes of protein regulation in pathways spanning diverse biological processes. In this review, we establish a framework for future work by outlining critical questions related to the biochemistry of polyphosphorylation, its therapeutic potential, and everything in between.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 63%
Unspecified 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,477,978
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#114
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,628
of 329,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.