↓ Skip to main content

The poorly known genus Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913 revisited (Opiliones: Cranaidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Zoological Studies, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The poorly known genus Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913 revisited (Opiliones: Cranaidae)
Published in
Zoological Studies, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40555-015-0117-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osvaldo Villarreal M, Adriano B Kury, Ricardo Pinto-da-Rocha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 35%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Studies
#151
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,120
of 280,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Studies
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.