@feelsdesperate @DanielHadas2 @Pseudoaugustus 0? Really? https://t.co/vVNRX6JqR8 https://t.co/fONxjFueH1 I mean, how many more do you want??? This is of course just one particular (and probably minor) example.
2018 review of bias in letters of recommendation: https://t.co/YaF9A9cQI0 Use of first names can imply solidarity: https://t.co/ferQFnaehZ Provocative blog – as we can’t seem to avoid bias in letters of recommendation, let’s get rid of them! https://t.co
RT @sarah_kark: Doubt raisers (statements that question an applicant’s aptness for a job) are more frequent in rec letters for women than m…
RT @sarah_kark: Doubt raisers (statements that question an applicant’s aptness for a job) are more frequent in rec letters for women than m…
Doubt raisers (statements that question an applicant’s aptness for a job) are more frequent in rec letters for women than men (by both male and female recommenders) ➡️ women are at a disadvantage relative to men in their academic job apps https://t.co/L
@Sheepshaggerz @OrigMrBeverage @benshapiro You wrote this in response to a scientific study.... https://t.co/uL1hoYYy74
@OrigMrBeverage @Sheepshaggerz @benshapiro Sexism is systematic and you don’t see it because you don’t experience it https://t.co/uL1hoYYy74
Also, recommendation letter about women raise doubts about them more often that they do with men candidates, and this places women are at a disadvantage relative to men in their applications. ⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/Iwt35cgYkU
RT @rozeggo: @drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the…
RT @rozeggo: @drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the…
RT @rozeggo: @drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the…
RT @rozeggo: @drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the…
RT @rozeggo: @drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the…
@drrachellowe @AdamJKucharski @LIDo_DTP Thanks for highlighting this Rachel! There are great resources for determining if the language is neutral, e.g. https://t.co/kKpqoMHIJE And the language in the letters *does* matter, e.g. https://t.co/Nc0rSeXfFg and
@QuantumDaisy A few sources (there are many more!): https://t.co/JlYJ4U5RJ2; https://t.co/XPtlvfd2sh; https://t.co/Z4PSjvOpMD; https://t.co/nf4cmJpZeM
RT @annaboconnell: This 2018 study in the Journal of Business Psychology documents the subtle language, termed 'doubt rasiers' - faint prai…
This 2018 study in the Journal of Business Psychology documents the subtle language, termed 'doubt rasiers' - faint praise, hedging, irrelevant comments - that are present more often in letters for women. https://t.co/WkgJkD78nO
RT @mkfeeneyWYO: It's letter writing season. Research shows letter writers are more likely to raise doubts (hedges, faint praise, negatives…
RT @mkfeeneyWYO: It's letter writing season. Research shows letter writers are more likely to raise doubts (hedges, faint praise, negatives…
RT @mkfeeneyWYO: It's letter writing season. Research shows letter writers are more likely to raise doubts (hedges, faint praise, negatives…
RT @mkfeeneyWYO: It's letter writing season. Research shows letter writers are more likely to raise doubts (hedges, faint praise, negatives…
It's letter writing season. Research shows letter writers are more likely to raise doubts (hedges, faint praise, negatives) in recommendations for women as compared to men. These doubts result in negative job outcomes that disproportionately affect women h
RT @LuttkeClaudia: @eternalechoes @ManelWatchIre No, it's not that simple. Women are not immune to implicit biases. https://t.co/EA3yH483X…
@eternalechoes @ManelWatchIre No, it's not that simple. Women are not immune to implicit biases. https://t.co/EA3yH483XT "The phenomenon that we have reported is not propagated more by male versus female letter writers ..." (p.12) Another study found no d
RT @bstabile1: "Women continue to be less likely than men to access academic careers, to attain full-time positions, and to be promoted and…
"Women continue to be less likely than men to access academic careers, to attain full-time positions, and to be promoted and tenured in the natural and social sciences, engineering, and mathematics disciplines." https://t.co/14Ti4wuhGj Raising Doubt in Let
RT @moon_jodi: "Women are at a disadvantage relative to men in their applications for academic positions" @profksaxton https://t.co/d6tvapW…
Wow - first venture pitch evaluations are gender biased and letters of recommendation... https://t.co/9w8wurQoRk
"Women are at a disadvantage relative to men in their applications for academic positions" @profksaxton https://t.co/d6tvapWlzD
Letters of recommendation written for women are more likely to contain language that casts doubt on their ability than letters written for men. https://t.co/O6YG178Zhw
RT @_AmandaJW: This thought-provoking article suggests that academic letters of recommendation for women include more "doubt raises"... eve…
This thought-provoking article suggests that academic letters of recommendation for women include more "doubt raises"... even when written by women! Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact https://t.co/