Title |
The science case for the EISCAT_3D radar
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40645-015-0051-8 |
Authors |
Ian McCrea, Anita Aikio, Lucilla Alfonsi, Evgenia Belova, Stephan Buchert, Mark Clilverd, Norbert Engler, Björn Gustavsson, Craig Heinselman, Johan Kero, Mike Kosch, Hervé Lamy, Thomas Leyser, Yasunobu Ogawa, Kjellmar Oksavik, Asta Pellinen-Wannberg, Frederic Pitout, Markus Rapp, Iwona Stanislawska, Juha Vierinen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 36% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 46% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,819,430
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#305
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,716
of 263,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.