↓ Skip to main content

The science case for the EISCAT_3D radar

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
The science case for the EISCAT_3D radar
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0051-8
Authors

Ian McCrea, Anita Aikio, Lucilla Alfonsi, Evgenia Belova, Stephan Buchert, Mark Clilverd, Norbert Engler, Björn Gustavsson, Craig Heinselman, Johan Kero, Mike Kosch, Hervé Lamy, Thomas Leyser, Yasunobu Ogawa, Kjellmar Oksavik, Asta Pellinen-Wannberg, Frederic Pitout, Markus Rapp, Iwona Stanislawska, Juha Vierinen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 23 46%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 16%
Engineering 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,819,430
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#305
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,716
of 263,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.