↓ Skip to main content

DeepNeuron: an open deep learning toolbox for neuron tracing

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 110)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
DeepNeuron: an open deep learning toolbox for neuron tracing
Published in
Brain Informatics, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40708-018-0081-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Zhou, Hsien-Chi Kuo, Hanchuan Peng, Fuhui Long

Abstract

Reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) morphology of neurons is essential for understanding brain structures and functions. Over the past decades, a number of neuron tracing tools including manual, semiautomatic, and fully automatic approaches have been developed to extract and analyze 3D neuronal structures. Nevertheless, most of them were developed based on coding certain rules to extract and connect structural components of a neuron, showing limited performance on complicated neuron morphology. Recently, deep learning outperforms many other machine learning methods in a wide range of image analysis and computer vision tasks. Here we developed a new Open Source toolbox, DeepNeuron, which uses deep learning networks to learn features and rules from data and trace neuron morphology in light microscopy images. DeepNeuron provides a family of modules to solve basic yet challenging problems in neuron tracing. These problems include but not limited to: (1) detecting neuron signal under different image conditions, (2) connecting neuronal signals into tree(s), (3) pruning and refining tree morphology, (4) quantifying the quality of morphology, and (5) classifying dendrites and axons in real time. We have tested DeepNeuron using light microscopy images including bright-field and confocal images of human and mouse brain, on which DeepNeuron demonstrates robustness and accuracy in neuron tracing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 17%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Engineering 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,881,428
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#34
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,416
of 333,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.