↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal changes in explant viability and contamination of tissue cultures from mature Scots pine

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Seasonal changes in explant viability and contamination of tissue cultures from mature Scots pine
Published in
Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture, January 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00033645
Authors

Anja Hohtola

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,137,403
of 11,309,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture
#96
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,268
of 106,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell, Tissue & Organ Culture
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,309,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them