| Title |
Targeting N-acetylglucosamine-bearing polymer-coated liposomes to vascular smooth muscle cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Artificial Organs, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10047-011-0595-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mamiko Ise, Hirohiko Ise, Yuji Shiba, Satoshi Kobayashi, Mitsuaki Goto, Masafumi Takahashi, Toshihiro Akaike, Uichi Ikeda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,326,734
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#12
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,917
of 120,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them