↓ Skip to main content

Targeting N-acetylglucosamine-bearing polymer-coated liposomes to vascular smooth muscle cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Artificial Organs, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 142)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Targeting N-acetylglucosamine-bearing polymer-coated liposomes to vascular smooth muscle cells
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10047-011-0595-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mamiko Ise, Hirohiko Ise, Yuji Shiba, Satoshi Kobayashi, Mitsuaki Goto, Masafumi Takahashi, Toshihiro Akaike, Uichi Ikeda

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Chemistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,136,395
of 11,307,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#29
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,140
of 106,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,307,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them