↓ Skip to main content

The need for microdissectional tumor cell preparation during the molecular genetic analysis of prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The need for microdissectional tumor cell preparation during the molecular genetic analysis of prostate cancer
Published in
World Journal of Urology, May 1999
DOI 10.1007/s003450050116
Authors

Markus Kuczyk, Jürgen Serth, Carsten Bokemeyer, Stefan Machtens, Jörn Schwede, Roland Herrmann, Ute Paeslack, Michael C. Truss, Ruth Knüchel, Udo Jonas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,131,764
of 11,300,336 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#217
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,814
of 105,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,300,336 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.