| Title |
Noninvasive Detection of Thin-Liquid Aspiration Using Dual-Axis Swallowing Accelerometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-012-9418-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catriona M. Steele, Ervin Sejdić, Tom Chau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,574,495
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#370
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,290
of 179,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.