↓ Skip to main content

Dark side of the seesaw

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Dark side of the seesaw
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep12(2018)007
Authors

Subhaditya Bhattacharya, Ivo de Medeiros Varzielas, Biswajit Karmakar, Stephen F. King, Arunansu Sil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,685,615
of 13,090,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#1,401
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,709
of 271,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#50
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,090,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.