↓ Skip to main content

Cloning, characterization, and engineering of fungal L-arabinitol dehydrogenases

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Cloning, characterization, and engineering of fungal L-arabinitol dehydrogenases
Published in
Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00253-010-2593-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Byoungjin Kim, Ryan P. Sullivan, Huimin Zhao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2011.
All research outputs
#3,104,736
of 11,267,729 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1,220
of 4,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,437
of 104,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,267,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.