↓ Skip to main content

Reconciling Autonomy and Beneficence in Treatment Decision-Making for Companion Animal Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Liverpool Law Review, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Reconciling Autonomy and Beneficence in Treatment Decision-Making for Companion Animal Patients
Published in
Liverpool Law Review, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10991-018-9211-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Gray, Marie Fox, Pru Hobson-West

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 26%
Social Sciences 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,695,234
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Liverpool Law Review
#25
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,319
of 331,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Liverpool Law Review
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.