↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2
Authors

Amelia Clarke, Andrew Crane

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Unspecified 16 18%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 33 38%
Unspecified 25 29%
Social Sciences 19 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#539,562
of 13,164,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#75
of 1,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,893
of 270,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#6
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,164,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.