↓ Skip to main content

Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: literature and good practices review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
Title
Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: literature and good practices review
Published in
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41239-018-0106-1
Authors

Álvaro Hernán Galvis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 392 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 47 12%
Student > Master 45 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Researcher 23 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 81 21%
Unknown 144 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 81 21%
Computer Science 34 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 26 7%
Arts and Humanities 26 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 3%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 149 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,354,247
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#68
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,699
of 337,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.