↓ Skip to main content

A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives
Published in
Financial Innovation, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40854-016-0027-8
Authors

Wenshuai Wu, Gang Kou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 19%
Engineering 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 12%
Computer Science 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,633,675
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#138
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,878
of 364,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.