In the current issue, @weichuman on the Danube Corridor Hypothesis: https://t.co/CKMmlJOmbd
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
For a critical view of the alleged ´very early' chronology of the #Aurignacian in C.Europe see our paper with J.Zilhao in Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology. No need to develop a Swabian Kulturpump model!! https://t.co/foOHhtv2Vg https://t.co/tmFlnorH70
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
At #UISPP2018Paris session XVII-4 first afyer break was @weichuman presenting his recent results from Romanian Upper #Palaeolithic that can be read up in his 2018 article https://t.co/fma6L2QPRv Afterwards Katarzyna Pyżewicz talked about use-wear lithics f
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
RT @ChrisStringer65: ‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the D…
‘reviews current knowledge of the Carpathian Basin’s archaeol. record and concludes that, while it cannot reject the Danube corridor hypothesis, further (geo)archaeol. work is required to understand the link between the Carpathian Basin and C.+SE Europe’
RT @andrej_choma: The Danube Corridor Hypothesis and the Carpathian Basin: Geological, Environmental and Archaeological Approaches to Chara…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
The Danube Corridor Hypothesis and the Carpathian Basin: Geological, Environmental and Archaeological Approaches to Characterizing Aurignacian Dynamics. https://t.co/fa1cObnKwP https://t.co/HoY1gqIX9m
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…
RT @weichuman: I am very pleased that my new paper reviewing the early Upper Palaeolithic of the Middle Danube is out: https://t.co/mfY8hu…