↓ Skip to main content

Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR

Overview of attention for article published in Information Retrieval, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 119)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR
Published in
Information Retrieval, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10791-006-0884-2
Authors

Eija Airio

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Czechia 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Librarian 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 85%
Linguistics 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,987,158
of 11,130,136 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval
#36
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,411
of 101,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,130,136 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 50th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them