↓ Skip to main content

The Types, Roles, and Practices of Documentation in Data Analytics Open Source Software Libraries

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 270)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
The Types, Roles, and Practices of Documentation in Data Analytics Open Source Software Libraries
Published in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10606-018-9333-1
Authors

R. Stuart Geiger, Nelle Varoquaux, Charlotte Mazel-Cabasse, Chris Holdgraf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 19%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Engineering 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,092,615
of 26,304,916 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#7
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,850
of 347,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,304,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.