↓ Skip to main content

The Types, Roles, and Practices of Documentation in Data Analytics Open Source Software Libraries

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
The Types, Roles, and Practices of Documentation in Data Analytics Open Source Software Libraries
Published in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10606-018-9333-1
Authors

R. Stuart Geiger, Nelle Varoquaux, Charlotte Mazel-Cabasse, Chris Holdgraf

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 23%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Engineering 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#954,162
of 24,479,790 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#6
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,601
of 336,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,479,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.