↓ Skip to main content

Capitation funding in Australia: Imperatives and impediments

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Management Science, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Capitation funding in Australia: Imperatives and impediments
Published in
Health Care Management Science, February 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1019037206624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart Peacock, Leonie Segal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Management Science
#201
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,894
of 111,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Management Science
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.