| Title |
Life cycle comparison of hydrothermal liquefaction and lipid extraction pathways to renewable diesel from algae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11027-012-9395-1 |
| Authors |
Edward D. Frank, Amgad Elgowainy, Jeongwoo Han, Zhichao Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 302 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 21% |
| Researcher | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 78 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 31 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,032,776
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#344
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,878
of 169,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.