↓ Skip to main content

IgA-specific proteins of pathogenic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
IgA-specific proteins of pathogenic bacteria
Published in
Biochemistry, February 2009
DOI 10.1134/s0006297909010027
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. N. Kazeeva, A. B. Shevelev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Researcher 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,404
of 22,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,060
of 185,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#39
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.