↓ Skip to main content

Fighting livelock in the GNU i-protocol: a case study in explicit-state model checking

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Fighting livelock in the GNU i-protocol: a case study in explicit-state model checking
Published in
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, August 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10009-002-0092-3
Authors

Yifei Dong, Xiaoqun Du, Gerard J. Holzmann, Scott A. Smolka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,946,035
of 10,992,167 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#9
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,164
of 101,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,992,167 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 51st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them