↓ Skip to main content

Effects of surgical site and inspired gas warming devices on body temperature during lower abdominal and thoracic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Effects of surgical site and inspired gas warming devices on body temperature during lower abdominal and thoracic surgery
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, October 1992
DOI 10.1007/s0054020060467
Authors

Tokuya Harioka, Tetsuhiro Sone, Kohichiro Nomura, Masahiro Kakuyama

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,601,293
of 12,433,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#66
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,692
of 272,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,433,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them