↓ Skip to main content

Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning
Published in
Landscape Ecology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0235-z
Authors

Meade Krosby, Ian Breckheimer, D. John Pierce, Peter H. Singleton, Sonia A. Hall, Karl C. Halupka, William L. Gaines, Robert A. Long, Brad H. McRae, Brian L. Cosentino, Joanne P. Schuett-Hames

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 50 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 38%
Unspecified 10 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 9 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,434,579
of 12,338,816 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#90
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,588
of 240,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,338,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.